Search This Blog

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Hyk-noreply-to-their-own-argument

Hyk-noreply-to-their-own-argument
 
Defendants offer evidence and when it is cross examined, they gag the discussion?
 
 
No one has any problems with the existence of the Hyksos except you.
This thread is closed. This is a bunch of alternative drivel and as I have mentioned this is not the board to do this.
///
Here they use the "evidence" found proves the Hyksos existed in those areas.
 
When I asked them "HYK-Whos-dump-is-it " .. when I showed the Egyptians were there centuries before and centuries after the supposed Hyksos and asked how they determined the remains belonged to the Hyksos,  the moderator closed the thread.
 
If they would use those artifacts to prove the Hyksos were there, wouldn't it be nice for them to give their evidence how they determined those finds were put there by the Hyksos?
 
Any way, I think I got all the major references they use to produce their hyksos story, it will give me places to search.
===============

 

~

zendz

2 comments:

  1. I am one of the Moderators of the afore-mentioned Egyptian discussion board. Let's set the record straight. A number of us cited specific, academic evidence to corroborate the reality of the Hyksos period, and in fact the debate ran on to several pages where we detailed the evidence that even moderate research can produce. Throughout it all arabisraelites deliberately ignored or dismissed our posts, and failed to defend his position in any manner that would stand up to scrutiny. My fellow Moderator closed the thread for this reason, and for the negative atmosphere it was absorbing. It did not live up to the scholastic strictures of our discussion board. That's the harsh truth.

    Now that I've written this comment for this blog, let's see if arabisraelites is big enough to leave it in place. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. A full reply to your comment is found here
    http://hyksos-hoax.blogspot.com/2009/07/hyk-censor-anonymous.html

    ReplyDelete