Thursday, July 16, 2009



Hyksos-060 ==============

Depending on which web site you read, the Hyksos are many times identified as Hebrews. What was a Hebrew? By the different definitions:

* If a Hebrew is a descendant of Eber, then there were hundreds of Hebrews other than Abraham and NONE of them created Israelites, but the masses of Hebrews created NON Israelites.

* If a Hebrew is people from the family of Abraham, then the Ammoites and Moabites were also Hebrews, because they are descendants of Abraham's nephew Lot.

* If Hebrews are descendants of Abraham, then almost all Hebrews were non Israelites.

1 Chronicles 1:29 These are their generations: the firstborn of Ishmael, Nebaioth; then Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam,

1 Chronicles 1:30 Mishma, and Dumah, Massa, Hadad, and Tema

1 Chronicles 1:31 Jetur, Naphish, and Kedemah. These are the sons of Ishmael.

If descendants of Abraham were Hebrews than all Ishmaelites would be Hebrews.


1 Chronicles 1:32 Now the sons of Keturah: Zimran, and Jokshan, and Medan, and Midian, and Ishbak, and Shuah. And the sons of Jokshan; Sheba, and Dedan.

1 Chronicles 1:33 And the sons of Midian; Ephah, and Epher, and Henoch, and Abida, and Eldaah.

If descendants of Abraham are Hebrews then all the children produced with Keturah were Hebrews.



35. The sons of Esau; Eliphaz, Reuel, and Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah.

36. The sons of Eliphaz; Teman, and Omar, Zephi, and Gatam, Kenaz, and Timna, and Amalek. (became the Amalekites)

37. Nahath, Zerah, Shammah, and Mizzah.

38. Lotan, and Shobal, and Zibeon, and Anah, and Dishon, and Ezer, and Dishan.

39. Hori, and Homam: and Timna

40. Alian, and Manahath, and Ebal, Shephi, and Onam. .. Aiah, and Anah.

41. Dishon. Amram, and Eshban, and Ithran, and Cheran.

42. Bilhan, and Zavan, and Jakan. .. Uz, and Aran.

Get the point, If a Hebrew is a descendant of Abraham, the Israelites were a trivial fraction of Hebrews AND other Hebrews fought Against the Israelties.

So why do web page authors use the term Hebrew in terms of the identification of Hyksos?

It is a way to convince ignorant people that the Israelites were connected to the Hyksos.

There would have been two sources of the identity of the Hyksos

* The Egyptians which never identified the Hyksos as Hebrews.

* The Hyksos themselves which never identified themselves as Hebrews.

So.. If there is NO ancient text that identifies Hyksos as Hebrews, then we know this concocted information comes from BSERS who just make up their fairy tale as they go along.

The actual ancient Egyptians would not have any idea what a Hebrew was supposed to be.

The clan that came to Egypt was Canaanites and there were less than 80 total of them ... wild guess, less than 20 males over 25.

They may have been identified as Israelites, as a family name or Canaanites by their nationality, but the idea of the Egyptians referring them as Hebrews is laughable.

By the scriptures the Israelites did produce children with the Egyptians, so the children of those Egyptians would have been Hebrews by any definition you please.

These cons inject the word Hebrew to identify the Hyksos, in order to make ignorant people believe there was a connection with the Israelites.

Show us the word Hebrew in any ancient text of Egypt? There is NO identification of the Hyksos as Hebrews, it is just another crock.