Saturday, September 19, 2009



As for Canaanites ruling Egypt, give me a break. Canaan was not an empire united under one power. Canaan was divided into dozens of tribes/nations. The artifacts from Canaan/Palestine are nothing compared to the Egyptian civilization.

In the bible stories, the Israelites did not come riding in on chariots

Genesis 41:42 And Pharaoh took off his ring from his hand, and put it upon Joseph's hand, and arrayed him in vestures of fine linen, and put a gold chain about his neck;

Genesis 41:43 And he made him to ride in the second chariot which he had.

Joseph got to ride in on Pharaoh's second chariot he had parked in the garage.

Genesis 46:5 And Jacob rose up from Beersheba: and the sons of Israel carried Jacob their father, and their little ones, and their wives, in the wagons which Pharaoh had sent to carry him. .. The Israelites did not even have their own transportation, Pharaoh had to send wagons to pick them up.

The whole 'Hyksos' caper is the promotion of European 'Jews' who try to make the world believe their ancestors ruled Egypt.


There is no hieroglyphics that tie any of the Egyptian enemy to the same population.

Hieroglyphics are just little pictures instead of letters. The pictures (glyphs) AND the sequence they were arranged, determined the meaning of the hieroglyphic text.

In this example

1 Identified a people in a tomb in the 12th dynasty
2 Identified a people in the 14th dynasty
3 Identified a people in the 15th dynasty
4 and 5 identified a people in the 18th dynasty

These hieroglyphics were found in different areas in different decades. Ok, Mr. Translator were the Egyptians identifying the same population or are these the identifications of different populations?

To generate these hypothetical names I used a silly hieroglyphic generator and each word is from 1 Germans, 2 Spanish, 3 Russians, 4 Americans, 5 French.

It is that simple, if you use the characters of Europeans, swap which character and which arrangement, that particular arrangement identifies a specific people.. and if it is a different arrangement, then it is the identification of a different people.

Look at countries around the world. They have conflicts with others from multiple outside nations and from inside factions. Why would any one just assume the reference in the different hieroglyphic sources are a reference to the same population?

There are multiple different sources from different decades and different parts of Egypt in which people assert, identify Hyksos.

The test is simple, extract the word said to be Hyksos or Asiatic from each source and place them where you can see them all, and see if they are the same or totally different hieroglyphic words.

Germans, Spanish, Russians, Americans, French .. hieroglyphic or European character sets, different characters in different arrangements is a different word.

Take all the hieroglyphics in which the Egyptians identify their enemy ... take that word which they call their enemy .. and place the hieroglyphic name of each enemy like the above example.

I don't know, but I am guessing most or all of these hieroglyphic sources identify each of their enemy with different hieroglyphic words?

It does not prove conclusively they were not the same people, but it does prove conclusively that there is not a shred of evidence connecting the enemy in one hieroglyphic source with an enemy in another hieroglyphic source ... The Egyptians were surrounded with other tribes/nations on all sides.