Thursday, August 6, 2009

HYK-Egyptologist-Scholar-Challenge

 

HYK-Egyptologist-Scholar-Challenge

EXISTING GROUPS OR INDIVIDUALS

When it comes to the identification of any people, the ONLY way any people by group or individuals can be identified is by ancient text written in their time of existence which specifically names that group or individual.

=============================

EVENTS THAT TOOK PLACE IN ANCIENT TIMES

The ONLY way to know what events any individuals or groups were involved in ancient times is by text written in the time those events took place.

=============================

PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF MAN MADE THINGS/EVENTS

If a city is found that has been burned, it does not take imagination to know some kind of fire took place, but with out ancient text, only a guess can be made as to what started the fire.

If volcanic ash is found, then the cause can be attributed to a natural disaster, other wise with out supporting text any speculation is based only on imagination.

With out text, physical evidence will reveal specific things happened. With out text physical evidence of man made artifacts or events can not be attributed to any group or individual.

=============================

SPECULATION BASED ON LOGIC/REASON

Using text or artifacts we can come to conclusions based on reason, and we can also weed out false logic.

George found a Kodak camera at the park and said the owner of this camera got it at K-mart (based on the fact that he saw a camera just like it at K-mart)... FALSE Logic

Because this item is sold at dozens of stores, it could have came from any of them.

ONLY if the item had a sticker (text) on it, identifying the store, could one assume where it came from.

* When ever a man made object is made in multiple locations, it is illogical to speculate which location it originated in.

=============================

THE BASIS OF ALL EVENTS IN ANCIENT HISTORY
IS TEXT, ARTIFACTS AND LOGIC

"Egyptologist say...."

In order for Egyptologist to state specific man made events took place, they must have ancient text to base that assertion on.

In order for Egyptologist to specifically identify the groups or individuals involved, they must have the ancient text to base that assertion on.

If you would look at ALL the ancient hieroglyphs, extract only the parts that are used as information about the 'Hyksos' and place that information on type written paper, there is not 50 pages that specifically deals with 'Hyksos' and yet there are thousands of pages of information written about them?

=============================

THE SUM OF EVIDENCE THAT HYKSOS RULED EGYPT
IS IN HIEROGLYPHS WRITTEN WHEN THEY WERE THERE
OR BY THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE THEY LEFT BEHIND

Any scientist/Egyptologist who is able to document their studies, any scholar who is able to document the basis of their assertions, can create a publication

A. Here is an image of the original papyrus, tablet, wall hieroglyphs that I take my information.

B. Next is a complete line, by line translation of the whole context.

C. "Eddy Egyptian wrote he took his grain to the city" on line 17 and here is the full hieroglyphic text with "I took the grain to the city" highlighted in blue.

Those of you who claim to have information about events of ancient Egyptians, here is my challenge.

* Produce a full image (that the hieroglyphs are not blurred) of the full text

* State your assertions and

* Highlight the original hieroglyph text segment that makes that statement

* Give the translation of the highlighted area of the text which confirms your assertion.

=============================

All evidence to back your assertion begins with a clear image of the original text or artifacts.

Any one who would like to debate the assertion the Hyksos ruled Egypt, begin with any ancient hieroglyph you wish.

Don't list them, take one at a time. Give a full translation of the full text and at the bottom of your report, write the translation of each line that makes your point.

17 Eddy Egyptian said

Line number, the translation which has information that makes your point.

=============================

My challenge to scholars / Egyptologist who promote the story that Hyksos ruled northern Egypt, is to begin with any text written in that time period or select any ancient artifact.

It is not one challenge, but each individual artifact or hieroglyph you present is an individaul challenge.

* Before ignorant ol me could dispute what almighty Egyptologist say, first show me where Egyptologist say that.

* Before you believe Egyptologist based on the flabbing of their lips, go to the ancient text to see it in the original and translation.

To know what ancient Egyptians said/believed you would have to read their words. It is not what Egyptologist say, the Egyptians said, if you have the ability to read heiroglyphs, the question is what Egyptians said.

=============================

THE CHALLENGE

Pick your specific artifact found in Egypt and sight your reason why that artifact proves your point.

Pick your specific source of heiroglyphs and heighlight the portion in blue which translates to make your point.

Creating and using any e-mail identity you wish, from that e-mail send a post to

hyksos-myth-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

After your membership is confirmed, you can then present your case by sending post to

hyksos-myth@yahoogroups.com

 

 

~

zendz